The demand for serverless GPU platforms has skyrocketed, empowering AI and machine learning engineers to run on-demand inference without the headache of managing underlying infrastructure. In this article, we compare top providers—including Runpod, Modal, Replicate, Novita AI, Fal AI, Baseten, Beam Cloud, Cerebrium, Google Cloud Run (with GPUs), and Azure Container Apps—to help you choose the best solution for your 2025 AI workloads.

We'll dive into key factors like pricing, scalability, GPU options, ease of use, and speed so you can make an informed decision for powering large language models (LLMs), image generation, video models, and more.

How We Compare Serverless GPU Clouds

Our evaluation of these platforms is based on the following criteria:

• Pricing: How each provider charges for GPU time (per-second/minute billing, free credits/tiers, and overall cost efficiency).
• Scalability: The ability to automatically scale up for traffic spikes and scale down to zero, plus any limits on concurrent GPUs.
• GPU Flexibility: The range of available GPUs—from entry-level cards to the latest high-performance accelerators.
• Ease of Use: How straightforward it is to deploy, manage, and monitor workloads (including available SDKs, templates, and developer tooling).
• Speed: Cold start times, inference latency, and overall performance in real-world usage.

The demand for serverless GPU platforms has skyrocketed, empowering AI and machine learning engineers to run on-demand inference without the headache of managing underlying infrastructure. In this article, we compare top providers—including Runpod, Modal, Replicate, Novita AI, Fal AI, Baseten, Beam Cloud, Cerebrium, Google Cloud Run (with GPUs), and Azure Container Apps—to help you choose the best solution for your 2025 AI workloads.

We'll dive into key factors like pricing, scalability, GPU options, ease of use, and speed so you can make an informed decision for powering large language models (LLMs), image generation, video models, and more.

How We Compare Serverless GPU Clouds

Our evaluation of these platforms is based on the following criteria:

• Pricing: How each provider charges for GPU time (per-second/minute billing, free credits/tiers, and overall cost efficiency).
• Scalability: The ability to automatically scale up for traffic spikes and scale down to zero, plus any limits on concurrent GPUs.
• GPU Flexibility: The range of available GPUs—from entry-level cards to the latest high-performance accelerators.
• Ease of Use: How straightforward it is to deploy, manage, and monitor workloads (including available SDKs, templates, and developer tooling).
• Speed: Cold start times, inference latency, and overall performance in real-world usage.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

‍

Top Serverless GPU Clouds in 2025

1. Runpod

Runpod continues to lead in affordability and variety. It offers a vast selection—from consumer-grade GPUs like the NVIDIA A4000 to data-center powerhouses such as the A100 and H100, along with AMD options—all on a pay-as-you-go basis.

Key Strengths:

• Low Pricing & Detailed Options: Runpod's pricing is transparent and competitive:

‍

• Impressive Cold Start Performance: While cold starts for large containers may run between 6–12 seconds, 48% of Runpod's serverless cold starts are under 200ms, ensuring rapid responsiveness for latency-sensitive applications.
• GPU Variety: Options span from entry-level 16GB GPUs up through high-end 80GB accelerators.
• Flexible Deployment: Offers container-based workflows with "Quick Deploy" templates, a REST API, and a Python SDK.

Key Weaknesses:

• • A slight learning curve exists for managing endpoints.
• • Built-in monitoring isn't as comprehensive as on some other platforms.

2. Modal

Modal is engineered for developers who want fine-grained control without the burden of infrastructure management. Its platform optimizes for fast cold starts and seamless autoscaling.

Key Strengths:

• Lightning-Fast Startups: Cold start times typically range between 2–4 seconds.
• Developer Experience: A robust Python SDK and automatic containerization let you focus on your code.
• Scalability: Easily scales to hundreds of GPUs, with Starter plans including free monthly credits.

Key Weaknesses:

• • Costs can be higher under heavy usage compared to some alternatives.
• • Ties you into Modal's specific deployment style and SDK.

Pricing Snapshot:

• • T4 (16GB): ~$0.000164/sec
• • 80GB A100: ~$0.000944/sec
• • NVIDIA H100: ~$0.001267/sec
• • Plus, every Starter plan comes with $30/month in free credits.

3. Replicate

Replicate simplifies the process of deploying pre-trained models via an expansive community library. It's perfect for quick experimentation, though custom deployments may face higher costs and slower cold starts.

Key Strengths:

• Extensive Model Library: Thousands of open-source models are ready to run via a simple REST API.
• Ease of Deployment: Zero-setup for known models using their open-source tool "Cog" for containerization.

Key Weaknesses:

• • Custom model deployments may experience cold start delays of 60+ seconds.
• • Pricing for GPU time can be higher, especially for premium GPU options.

Pricing Snapshot:

• • T4 (16GB): ~$0.000225/sec
• • 80GB A100: ~$0.00140/sec
• • Multi-GPU options available for larger workloads.

4. Fal AI

Fal AI is focused on premium GPU performance and is ideal for developers running diffusion models and other generative workloads.

Key Strengths:

• Premium Hardware: Specializes in top-tier GPUs such as the H100 and A100, with competitive per-second pricing.
• Optimized Inference: Custom inference engine and techniques like TensorRT acceleration drive low-latency performance.
• Cost Efficiency for Heavy Models: Offers pricing that can be significantly lower per run for tasks such as Stable Diffusion XL.

Key Weaknesses:

• • Fewer GPU choices overall, as the focus is on high-end performance.
• • No permanent free tier, though promotional credits may be available periodically.

Pricing Snapshot:

• • 80GB H100: ~$0.00125/sec ($4.50/hr)
• • 40GB A100: ~$0.00111/sec ($3.99/hr)
• • 48GB A6000: ~$0.000575/sec ($2.07/hr)

5. Baseten

Baseten simplifies deploying and scaling ML models using its open-source framework called Truss, making it ideal for teams moving from prototype to production.

Key Strengths:

• Ease of Deployment: Truss automates container image creation and integrates with a clean web UI for monitoring.
• Flexible Scaling: Automatically scales from 5 replicas on the free tier up to unlimited scaling on Pro/Enterprise plans.
• Diverse GPU Options: Offers configurations ranging from cost-effective T4s to high-end A100s and H100s.

Key Weaknesses:

• • Slightly higher per-minute rates compared to bare infrastructure, as you're paying for the added platform features.

Pricing Snapshot:

• • NVIDIA T4: 1.75¢/minute ($1.05/hr)
• • L4 GPU: ~$0.85/hr
• • Full H100: ~$9.98/hr (or via fractional use with "MIG")

6. Novita AI

Novita AI targets budget-conscious users who still need robust performance. Its competitive pricing and multi-region support make it a great option for both inference and development.

Key Strengths:

• Cost Efficiency: Prices as low as $0.35/hr for RTX 4090 and A100 configurations, with even lower rates reported on certain models like the RTX 3090 (~$0.20/hr).
• Global Reach: Auto-scales across 20+ locations on 4 continents.
• Ease of Use: One-click JupyterLab environments and simple APIs/SDKs enable rapid experimentation.

Key Weaknesses:

• • As a newer platform, community support and documentation are still growing.

Pricing Snapshot:

• • RTX 4090 (24GB): ~$0.35/hr
• • A100 SXM (80GB): ~$0.35/hr
• • RTX 3090: Reported around $0.20/hr

7. Beam Cloud

Beam Cloud is built around rapid container spin-ups and efficient scheduling. Its developer-centric design, including a Python SDK and hot-reloading, makes it highly attractive for iterative development.

Key Strengths:

• Ultra-Fast Cold Starts: Many functions start in just 2–3 seconds.
• Low-Cost Billing: Per-second pricing is among the most competitive, and a free tier provides 10 hours of GPU time.
• Developer Tools: An intuitive CLI, SDK, and live hot-reloading streamline the development process.

Key Weaknesses:

• • Free/basic plans have lower concurrency limits (e.g., 3 GPUs) compared to higher-tier plans.

Pricing Snapshot:

• • T4 (16GB): ~$0.000150/sec
• • RTX 4090 (24GB): ~$0.000192/sec
• • 40GB A100: ~$3.50/hr
• • 80GB H100: ~$7.15/hr

8. Cerebrium

Cerebrium stands out with its broad hardware selection and ease of use. It supports a wide array of GPUs while ensuring rapid autoscaling and low latency for both real-time and batch processing.

Key Strengths:

• Wide GPU Portfolio: Offers 12+ GPU types—from mid-range options to the latest H100s.
• Developer-Friendly: Deploy Python code directly with minimal configuration, plus support for batching and websocket endpoints.
• Optimized Performance: Achieves cold start times as low as 2–4 seconds.

Key Weaknesses:

• • The per-second pricing model can add up for continuous heavy workloads, though it remains competitive overall.

Pricing Snapshot:

• • Example mid-tier configuration: ~$0.000306/sec for GPU (total around $1.36/hr when including CPU/memory)

9. Google Cloud Run (with GPUs)

Google Cloud Run now offers GPU support for containerized applications. It combines the familiarity of Cloud Run with the power of GPU acceleration.

Key Strengths:

• Managed Infrastructure: No need to manage Kubernetes or VM clusters—just deploy your container.
• Scalability: Can scale from zero up to 1000 instances per service.
• Ecosystem Integration: Seamlessly ties into the broader Google Cloud ecosystem.

Key Weaknesses:

• • Currently supports only the NVIDIA L4 (24GB), though more options are expected over time.
• • Additional CPU and memory costs apply alongside GPU usage.

Pricing Snapshot:

• • NVIDIA L4 GPU: ~$0.000233/sec (~$0.84/hr) plus standard CPU/memory rates

10. Azure Container Apps (with Serverless GPUs)

Azure Container Apps now supports serverless GPUs, allowing you to deploy GPU-backed microservices with ease while leveraging Azure's mature management tools.

Key Strengths:

• Integrated Experience: Use familiar Azure tools, CLI, and monitoring via Azure Monitor.
• Flexible Scaling: Managed, event-driven scaling that quickly ramps up or down based on demand.
• Enterprise-Grade: Benefits from Azure's security, compliance, and data governance features.

Key Weaknesses:

• • Currently in public preview, so pricing details are still evolving and availability is limited to select regions.
• • Setup may require additional configuration (e.g., whitelisting, specific region selection).

Pricing Snapshot:

• • Estimated for an A100 GPU: ~$0.0008–0.0011/sec
• • Also supports NVIDIA T4 GPUs for smaller workloads

Conclusion

When choosing a serverless GPU cloud for your 2025 AI needs, your decision ultimately depends on what you're looking for—whether it's low latency, flexible pricing, or robust scaling. Each provider has its own unique strengths.

However, if you're after the best overall balance of pricing, scalability, GPU flexibility, ease of use, and speed—with standout cold start performance (48% under 200ms)—Runpod is our top pick across all features.